Past-results notice: This page describes a prior matter for informational purposes. Every case depends on its own facts and law, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Aggravated assault is not a single fact pattern. Pennsylvania's statute includes different theories involving serious bodily injury, attempts to cause such injury, use of a deadly weapon, protected persons, and specified child-related conduct. The grading and proof depend on the subsection charged, the alleged mental state, injury evidence, relationship or status of the people involved, and any claim of self-defense. Current statutory text—not an older excerpt—must guide the assessment.
Is this your situation?
The page should help a reader identify the prosecution theory without reducing aggravated assault to injury severity alone. Attempt, weapon, protected-person, age-specific, causation, identity, and justification issues can each control the analysis.
A fight or confrontation resulted in serious-injury allegations or hospitalization.
Police allege use or attempted use of a firearm, knife, vehicle, or other deadly weapon.
The alleged victim falls within a protected occupational or statutory category.
The charge involves a child or another subsection with age- or relationship-specific elements.
You claim self-defense, defense of another person, mistaken identity, or that the injury and intent were overstated.
Immediate risks
These allegations can affect liberty, contact, employment, and firearm possession before trial. Clients should follow bail and protection orders, preserve rather than recreate evidence, avoid witness contact, and disclose any related PFA or probation matter.
Aggravated-assault charges can be felonies and may carry substantial incarceration and collateral consequences.
Bail, no-contact, firearm, employment, and professional-license restrictions can arise before trial.
Surveillance, phone video, 911 audio, medical records, clothing, scene evidence, and witness memories can disappear or change.
Contact with the complainant can violate a court order or be interpreted as pressure even when initiated by the other person.
Companion charges and a PFA, probation, or firearm matter may proceed on related but distinct tracks.
What happens next?
The roadmap moves from exact subsection and bail through preliminary proof, medical and scene evidence, motions, and trial or resolution. It should not include a long, potentially stale case-law digest.
1
Complaint, bail, and safety orders
The complaint identifies the charged subsection and supporting allegations. Counsel confirms bail, no-contact, surrender, and appearance obligations.
2
Preliminary hearing
The Commonwealth presents a prima facie case concerning injury or attempt, mental state, weapon, victim status, identification, and other required elements.
3
Discovery and investigation
The parties develop medical evidence, scene records, video, communications, witness accounts, forensic material, and evidence relevant to self-defense or causation.
4
Motions and resolution review
Counsel evaluates admissibility, identification, expert, self-defense, grading, severance, negotiation, and other pretrial issues based on the developed record.
5
Trial or disposition
If the case is not dismissed or resolved, the Commonwealth must prove the charged subsection beyond a reasonable doubt, subject to any properly raised defense.
How counsel helps
Counsel should connect the charged statutory theory to injury, intent, causation, identification, and justification evidence. The task is to test each required element while preparing responsibly for the seriousness of the alleged harm.
Match the allegations to the current § 2702 subsection, grading, protected status, injury definition, and required mental state.
Preserve surveillance, 911 calls, medical and scene records, photographs, messages, witness accounts, and physical evidence.
Enforce discovery rights and challenge inadmissible, unreliable, or insufficient evidence through appropriate motions and objections.
Explain trial, negotiation, sentencing, and collateral-consequence choices without minimizing the charge or promising a result.
Detailed Lehigh Valley Guidance
The overview above addresses immediate decisions. The sections below provide additional local and topic-specific detail.
Aggravated Assault Attorneys in Easton Pennsylvania, Serving Lehigh & Northampton County
Our Lehigh Valley Criminal Defense Law Firm has attorneys for Aggravated Assualt Charges in Northampton & Lehigh County
Our Aggravated Assault Defense Attorneys Represent Defendants in Allentown, Bethlehem & Easton and throughout the Greater Lehigh Valley
Our Aggravated Attorneys have represented numerous individuals charged with Aggravated Assault in Easton, Allentown, Bethlehem & the Greater Lehigh Valley. We have successfully had Lehigh & Northampton County Aggravated Assault charges dismissed or downgraded.
In Pennsylvania, Aggravated Assault is graded as a felony offense. Although unlikely, the sentence for aggravated assault can reach up to 20 years in prison.
Aggravated Assault charges are often the result of the police or district attorney overreaching on what would otherwise be a simple assault charge. Other times Aggravated Assault is charged in Lehigh County & Northampton County when the alleged victim holds a certain status, such as a police officer or paramedic. Often, these charges may be dismissed because the defendant did not have the requisite intent or the injury was not serious enough to constitute the crime. Police are also prone to charge every individual involved in an altercation involving a gun with aggravated assault but, to do so, they must be able to prove that the gun could actually fire and the person charged had the intent to do more than simply scare someone else.
Our Criminal Defense Attorneys in Easton, Pennsylvania are here to help. Call now if you, or a loved one, are facing Aggravated Assault charges.
Our Approach to Defending Aggravated Assault Charges in the Lehigh Valley
Aggressive Aggravated Assault Lawyers in Easton, Allentown & Bethlehem
Early Intervention & Aggressive Aggravated Assault Defense
Early Retention of a Lehigh Valley Criminal Defense Attorney Can Be an Important Step in Defending Aggravated Assault Charges in Easton, Allentown & Bethlehem
When at all possible we want to be involved in a Lehigh or Northampton County Aggravated Assault case as early as possible. As time passes, memories fade or distort and witnesses may become harder and harder to track down. Security camera footage in Allentown, Bethlehem or Easton may be overwritten and cell phone records may be destroyed. early contact may provide more time to preserve evidence and prepare.
When at all possible, we prefer to be involved in an Aggravated Assault case, prior to the Preliminary Hearing in order to maximize our ability to defend against the Aggravated Assault charges. It is often imperative that an Aggravated Assault Lawyer be able to hold a preliminary hearing to test the Commonwealth's evidence in an Aggravated Assault case. Contact our Criminal Defense Lawyers to learn more.
Aggravate Assault Law in Easton, Pennsylvania
Below you can find the Pennsylvania Aggravated Assault Statute and some precedent favorable to the Defense of Aggravated Assault Charges
Aggravated assault - 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702
Aggravated assault - 18 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 2702
(a) Offense defined.--A person is guilty of aggravated
assault if he:
(1) attempts to cause serious bodily injury to another,
or causes such injury intentionally, knowingly or recklessly
under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the
value of human life;
(2) attempts to cause or intentionally, knowingly or
recklessly causes serious bodily injury to any of the
officers, agents, employees or other persons enumerated in
subsection (c) or to an employee of an agency, company or
other entity engaged in public transportation, while in the
performance of duty;
(3) attempts to cause or intentionally or knowingly
causes bodily injury to any of the officers, agents,
employees or other persons enumerated in subsection (c), in
the performance of duty;
(4) attempts to cause or intentionally or knowingly
causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon;
(5) attempts to cause or intentionally or knowingly
causes bodily injury to a teaching staff member, school board
member or other employee, including a student employee, of
any elementary or secondary publicly-funded educational
institution, any elementary or secondary private school
licensed by the Department of Education or any elementary or
secondary parochial school while acting in the scope of his
or her employment or because of his or her employment
relationship to the school;
(6) attempts by physical menace to put any of the
officers, agents, employees or other persons enumerated in
subsection (c), while in the performance of duty, in fear of
imminent serious bodily injury; or
(7) uses tear or noxious gas as defined in section
2708(b) (relating to use of tear or noxious gas in labor
disputes) or uses an electric or electronic incapacitation
device against any officer, employee or other person
enumerated in subsection (c) while acting in the scope of his
employment.
(b) Grading.--Aggravated assault under subsection (a)(1) and
(2) is a felony of the first degree. Aggravated assault under
subsection (a)(3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) is a felony of the
second degree.
(c) Officers, employees, etc., enumerated.--The officers,
agents, employees and other persons referred to in subsection
(a) shall be as follows:
(1) Police officer.
(2) Firefighter.
(3) County adult probation or parole officer.
(4) County juvenile probation or parole officer.
(5) An agent of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and
Parole.
(6) Sheriff.
(7) Deputy sheriff.
(8) Liquor control enforcement agent.
(9) Officer or employee of a correctional institution,
county jail or prison, juvenile detention center or any other
facility to which the person has been ordered by the court
pursuant to a petition alleging delinquency under 42 Pa.C.S.
Ch. 63 (relating to juvenile matters).
(10) Judge of any court in the unified judicial system.
(11) The Attorney General.
(12) A deputy attorney general.
(13) A district attorney.
(14) An assistant district attorney.
(15) A public defender.
(16) An assistant public defender.
(17) A Federal law enforcement official.
(18) A State law enforcement official.
(19) A local law enforcement official.
(20) Any person employed to assist or who assists any
Federal, State or local law enforcement official.
(21) Emergency medical services personnel.
(22) Parking enforcement officer.
(23) A magisterial district judge.
(24) A constable.
(25) A deputy constable.
(26) A psychiatric aide.
(27) A teaching staff member, a school board member or
other employee, including a student employee, of any
elementary or secondary publicly funded educational
institution, any elementary or secondary private school
licensed by the Department of Education or any elementary or
secondary parochial school while acting in the scope of his
or her employment or because of his or her employment
relationship to the school.
(28) Governor.
(29) Lieutenant Governor.
(30) Auditor General.
(31) State Treasurer.
(32) Member of the General Assembly.
(33) An employee of the Department of Environmental
Protection.
(34) An individual engaged in the private detective
business as defined in section 2(a) and (b) of the act of
August 21, 1953 (P.L.1273, No.361), known as The Private
Detective Act of 1953.
(35) An employee or agent of a county children and youth
social service agency or of the legal representative of such
agency.
(36) A public utility employee or an employee of an
electric cooperative.
(d) Definitions.--As used in this section, the following
words and phrases shall have the meanings given to them in this
subsection:
"Electric or electronic incapacitation device." A portable
device which is designed or intended by the manufacturer to be
used, offensively or defensively, to temporarily immobilize or
incapacitate persons by means of electric pulse or current,
including devices operated by means of carbon dioxide
propellant. The term does not include cattle prods, electric
fences or other electric devices when used in agricultural,
animal husbandry or food production activities.
"Emergency medical services personnel." The term includes,
but is not limited to, doctors, residents, interns, registered
nurses, licensed practical nurses, nurse aides, ambulance
attendants and operators, paramedics, emergency medical
technicians and members of a hospital security force while
working within the scope of their employment
Relevant Aggravated Assault Case Law
Intent & Aggravated Assault
To commit an aggravated assault, one must either cause or attempt to cause serious bodily injury to another. Intentionally putting someone in fear of such injury is not sufficient to establish aggravated assault. Comm. v. Paige, 287 Pa. Super. 133, 429 A.2d 1135 (1981)
Self defense & Aggravated Assault
A person may not be held criminally liable when (s)he unintentionally, even recklessly or negligently, injures an innocent bystander while using justifiable force in self defense. Comm. v. Fowlin, 551 Pa. 414, 710 A.2d 1130 (1998)
One Punch & Aggravated Assault
A single punch resulting a broken nose is insufficient to establish serious bodily injury or intent to cause serious bodily injury if the victim had reason to believe he may be hit. Comm. v. Alexander, 477 Pa. 190, 383 A.2d 887 (1978). But a single punch resulting in a broken nose and a severed artery may be sufficient to establish serious bodily injury. Comm. v. Caterino, 451 Pa. Super. 42, 678 A.2d 389 (1996)
However, a “sucker” punch, to an unsuspecting victim may establish requisite intent for aggravated assault. Com. V. Burton, 2 A.3d 598 (Pa.Super. 2010); Commonwealth v. Patrick, 933 A.2d 1043 (Pa. Super. 2007)
Guns & Aggravated Assault
Pointing an unloaded gun at a victim as a threat to cause serious bodily injury is sufficient for simple assault but cannot constitute aggravated assault. Comm. V. Savage, 275 Pa. Super. 96, 418 A.2d 629 (1980)
Conditional threats while pointing a handgun at victim may not be sufficient to establish aggravated assault. “(Defendant’s) words and actions in (this case) are in the nature of an implied conditional threat, i.e., either let me in the house or I may shoot you. Such a threat, conditioned on the victim’s performance of some act, is insufficient to prove aggravated assault. This is because the sated condition goes to the defendant’s present intent at the time the threat is issued.” Comm. v. Alford, 880 A.2d 666 (Pa. Super. 2003)
Bodily Injury & Aggravated Assault
Mere scratches, even if rendered with a deadly weapon are not bodily injury. Comm. V. Mayo, 272 Pa. Super., 115, 414 A.2d 696 (1979)
Criminal Court Process In Lehigh & Northampton County
A brief explanation of the different court hearings in an Aggravated Assault case in Lehigh County & Northampton County
Filing of Charges
An Aggravated Assault case begins with the filing of the charging paperwork in the District Court. The District Court serves as the gatekeeper for the Court of Common Pleas and generally does not decide guilt or innocence nor does it impose sentences in Misdemeanor and Felony cases.
As all Aggravated Assault charges are felonies, almost all Aggravated Assault case will begin with a preliminary arraignment upon arrest.
Preliminary Arraignment
The Preliminary Arraignment is the first court date a defendant must attend. At the preliminary Arraignment the MDJ will set bail. If an arrest warrant has issued, this will occur prior to the preliminary hearing. If a preliminary hearing was scheduled via summons, the Preliminary Arraignment will occur simultaneous to the Preliminary Hearing.
Preliminary Hearing
Preliminary Hearings are the first opportunity for the Defense to test the evidence the Commonwealth plans to bring against them in a Lehigh County or Northampton County Aggravated Assault case. While the burden the Commonwealth must meet at this level is very low, it is a critical stage of the defense because it allows for the opportunity to lay the strategic groundwork that may make or break a defense in the upper courts. You should never waive a preliminary hearing without an attorney.
Formal Arraignment
Formal Arraignment is the first court appearance in the Court of Common Pleas in an Aggravated Assault case. The purpose of the Formal Arraignment is to inform defendants of certain rights they have and deadlines in their case. If negotiations have led to a favorable plea agreement in your case, a plea may be entered at this court date
Pre-Trial Motions & Hearings
Depending on the individual case, any of the following types of court hearings may occur after preliminary arraignment but before a trial:
• Diversionary Program Hearing – A diversionary program may permit an eligible person to complete court-ordered conditions without a conviction if admitted and completed successfully. ARD and treatment-court eligibility are governed by statute, current county criteria, prosecutorial discretion, and court approval; prior history may affect eligibility.
• Habeas Corpus Hearing – A Habeas Corpus hearing, like a preliminary hearing, may be held to contest the sufficiency of the Commonwealth’s evidence prior to a trial.
• Suppression Hearing – A suppression hearing may be held to have evidence illegally obtained by the police ruled inadmissible at trial.
• Guilty Plea – If the Commonwealth and the defendant agree upon the terms of a guilty plea, a plea may occur at any time throughout the criminal court process
Criminal Trial
Whether a criminal trial is heard by a jury or by a judge depends on the grading, the right to a jury, any valid waiver, the court’s approval where required, and case-specific strategy. The decision should follow review of the charge, likely evidence, available defenses, and procedural rules—not a generalized assumption about emotion.
If the case proceeds as a jury trial, the court and counsel examine potential jurors under the applicable rules. Challenges for cause and the permitted number of peremptory challenges depend on the case and governing procedure. The process continues until a qualified jury is selected and sworn.
After a jury is chosen, the trial begins with opening statements.
Because the government has the burden of proof, the prosecutor is allowed to make his opening statement first. The defense will then have the option of making an opening statement or waiting until after the prosecution rests its case.
Defense lawyers usually opt to deliver opening statements immediately after the prosecution so that jurors can examine the government’s evidence under the defense’s theory of the case.
After the opening statement(s), each side has the opportunity to present its case.
The prosecution must present its case first. During this time the government presents evidence and elicits testimony from its witnesses. The defense is entitled to cross-examine each witness that the government calls. The prosecution must establish each charge beyond a reasonable doubt.
When the prosecution rests, the defense may seek a judgment of acquittal when supported. The defense may then present evidence, but it has no obligation to do so and the defendant has a constitutional right not to testify. If a motion is denied, counsel and the client make the remaining trial decisions under the applicable rules.
After the presentation of evidence concludes, the parties may make closing arguments. The order of argument and any rebuttal follow the applicable rules and the court’s directions.
The defendant may testify as a witness in his or her defense. However, doing so opens the door for the prosecution to attempt to discredit the witness and in many cases allows the prosecution to bring up harmful information from the defendant’s past.
While the prosecution must establish its case beyond a reasonable doubt, the defense has no obligation to present a case. When advantageous, the defense may rely solely upon raising a reasonable doubt in the prosecution’s case.
After the closing arguments, the judge will read specific instructions to the jury outlining the legal standards necessary to decide if the defendant is to be found guilty or not guilty. The jury then leaves the courtroom to deliberate the case.
If the jurors cannot reach a unanimous verdict, the court may declare a mistrial. A hung jury does not automatically dismiss the charges; subject to constitutional limits and later court rulings, the prosecution may seek a new trial or may decide not to retry the case.
Are you looking for someone to help?
Contact the office at (484) 548-0529
· Mon - Fri 09:00-17:00
Law Office Staff
Frequently asked questions
What separates aggravated assault from simple assault?
The distinction depends on the charged subsection and can involve injury severity, an attempt to cause serious bodily injury, use of a deadly weapon, protected status, age, or another statutory circumstance. The complaint and current § 2702 control.
Is an actual serious injury always required?
No. Some subsections address an attempt to cause serious bodily injury, while others require bodily injury, serious bodily injury, or a particular victim or weapon circumstance. Intent and surrounding conduct can therefore be central.
What counts as a deadly weapon?
Pennsylvania uses a statutory definition that considers the object and how it was used or intended to be used. An ordinary object may be alleged as a deadly weapon in particular circumstances, but the label must be supported by evidence.
Can self-defense apply?
Potentially. Justification depends on what the person reasonably believed, the force threatened, the force used, who initiated or escalated the encounter, retreat rules where applicable, and other facts. It requires detailed evidence review.
Can the alleged victim drop the charge?
The Commonwealth, not a private complainant, controls the prosecution. A witness's position may affect evidence or strategy, but no one should violate a no-contact order or attempt to influence testimony.
Next step
Prepare for a Paid Aggravated-Assault Consultation
Bring the complaint, affidavit if available, bail and no-contact orders, hearing notices, medical or injury information lawfully in your possession, photographs, messages, and related PFA or probation documents. Preserve clothing, video, 911 information, location records, and witness names without contacting the complainant. The consultation should identify the charged subsection, immediate restrictions, preservation requests, and the evidence relevant to intent, injury, identity, or justification.
Important: This page provides general information, not legal advice. Deadlines, procedures, eligibility, and potential outcomes depend on the specific facts and current law. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing this page.